Check an IP Address, Domain Name, Subnet, or ASN
185.247.137.70 has a very high threat confidence level of 85%, originating from Manchester, United Kingdom, on the Driftnet Ltd network (211298). It has been observed across 252 sessions targeting MSSQL, HTTPS, POSTGRES, SMTP, SIP and 9 other protocols, First observed on January 21, 2026, most recently active March 5, 2026.
FTP session where the client upgrades to TLS (AUTH TLS) and proceeds to request server capability information using FEAT, HELP, and SYST before cleanly terminating the session. This pattern indicates structured service and feature enumeration rather than file interaction. The sequence is consistent with automated reconnaissance used to fingerprint FTP server configuration, supported extensions, and implementation details
Client performs a modern MongoDB handshake using the hello command followed by a buildinfo request to gather server capabilities and version details. This sequence is commonly associated with automated fingerprinting or discovery activity against exposed MongoDB instances rather than normal application queries.
Identifies HTTP requests targeting the web server root path ("/"), typically used for initial service discovery, host validation, or baseline content inspection prior to deeper enumeration.
Identifies execution of the Redis INFO command (case-insensitive), which retrieves server configuration, version, memory usage, and runtime statistics. This behavior reflects service interrogation and environment fingerprinting activity. While INFO can be used legitimately by administrators, it is also commonly observed during automated scanning and pre-exploitation reconnaissance of exposed Redis instances.
Identifies HTTPS requests targeting the web server root path ("/"), typically used for initial service discovery, host validation, or baseline content inspection prior to deeper enumeration
Automated SMTP interaction performing a minimal capability check by issuing EHLO followed by a STARTTLS upgrade request and immediately terminating the session. This pattern is commonly associated with internet-wide scanners, security research crawlers, or opportunistic bots verifying whether an SMTP service supports encrypted communication. The absence of authentication attempts or message submission indicates reconnaissance or service fingerprinting rather than active abuse.